« Joseph Provenzano An Animal's place in America In 1975, an Australian philosopher by the name of Peter Singer first published his controversial book Animal ...» Document abstract
$2.95
3 word format
Language : english
literature
school essay
date published
19/11/2007
review : not yet assessed
level : Advanced
requested 0 times
SummaryIn 1975, an Australian philosopher by the name of Peter Singer first published his controversial book Animal Liberation. It has since become widely known as the beginning of the current “animal liberation movement” in America. The book preached the virtues of vegetarianism and vilified the American agribusiness, which Singer believed was highly immoral. Singer’s Animal Liberation has had many varying effects on the world; and specifically, the United States. Singer’s book had a great number of admirer’s, as well as its fair share of critics. In November of 2002, New York Times contributing writer Michael Pollan wrote an article entitled “An Animal’s Place.” This article dispelled some of the myths behind Singer’s Animal Liberation, as well criticized some of Singer’s ideas. Pollan’s article, however, is more than a mere argument against Singer’s belief system. Pollan delves into Singer’s arguments, and points out that while some are valid, many are not.
Table of Contents
- Michael Pollan begins his article with a bit of humor, recalling that the first time he read Singer's Animal Liberation he was 'dining alone at the Palm, trying to enjoy a rib-eye steak cooked medium-rare?
- The suffering of animals is not something to be taken lightly by anyone. However, Pollan remains true to the belief that they are just animals, and should not be compared to human beings.
- One of key concepts of Animal Liberation is that of 'speciesism.' Singer defines 'speciesism' as 'a prejudice or attitude of bias in favor of the interests of members of one's own species and against those of members of other species
- Kant, the well-known philosopher, believed that it was never moral for anyone to treat a 'rational creature' merely as a means to an end.
- The central argument of Peter Singer's case is that animals should not be made to suffer for the benefit of humans.
- One thing that Peter Singer and Michael Pollan agree on is the fact that factory farms can be needlessly brutal.
- Peter Singer's heart is in the right place. Animal suffering is never a good thing, and Singer is correct in wanting to put an end to it wherever possible.
« processes sex-specific pheromones, which influence animal partner choice. Love's place lies in the head and not Mikulincer, Mario and Goodman, Gail S. New York ...» Document abstract
$2.95
3 word format
Language : english
social sciences
research papers
date published
02/10/2007
review : not yet assessed
level : General public
requested 0 times
SummaryUsually love finds its place in literature, an ideal romantics hold closely to their hearts. Studies, however, show that love belongs more in the logical world of science rather than the idealistic realm of romance. Darwinian evolution, neurotransmitters and autonomic functioning appear to provide the main basis for love, with its true root lying in the brain rather than the heart. While love varies in its intensity and form from the lust present in a one night stand to the tender warmth between a mother and child, romantic love exhibits a very specific set of traits across all couples. In the past, romantic love has been put in terms of heterosexual couples because homosexual couples were thought to be unnatural perversions, but recent evidence proves that homosexuality has a far more natural and biological basis than was previously thought, suggesting that homosexuals experience the same romantic love as heterosexuals.
Table of Contents
- Usually love finds its place in literature, an ideal romantics hold closely to their hearts.
- Love begins with choosing a mate.
- Neurotransmitters can also mean the difference between physical attraction from a distance and romantic attraction that turns into an actual relationship
- Many scientists now consider love a biological drive rather than a superfluous romantic attraction
- The hypothalamus also processes sex-specific pheromones, which influence animal partner choice.
- Love spans differences in culture, age, and even sexual preference to become onte of the most universal human ideas.
« income groups flocked to see footrace, animal blood battles S: 1.2 Brief History of Bodybuilding and Its First The second-place winner would be awarded a solid ...» Document abstract
$9.95
14 word format
Language : english
sports
presentation
date published
12/01/2006
review : not yet assessed
level : Expert
requested 5 times
SummaryAmerican sports have evolved from the simple folk games and premodern pastimes of the colonial era to the highly complex, commercial spectacles of the early twenty-first century. (For the purposes of this essay sports are defined as competitive athletic games that demand a significant degree of physical activity.) Many factors shaped the development of sports in colonial British America and in the United States. Among the most significant were industrialization, urbanization, and ideological and cultural trends, especially those involving religion, social class, ethnicity, race, and gender.
During the Colonial Era the English, Dutch, and other European settlers who established the thirteen colonies that became the United States brought with them premoder pastimes and folk games that had been popular amusements in the Old World for centuries. These included early version of cricket, baseball, golf, football, and bowling, and also foot racing and pitching quoits (similar to tossing horseshoes). Combat sports such as wrestling, boxing, and cudgeling (fighting with sticks), and animal and blood sports – especially bull baiting and cockfighting – also enjoyed great favor.
During the Colonial Era the English, Dutch, and other European settlers who established the thirteen colonies that became the United States brought with them premoder pastimes and folk games that had been popular amusements in the Old World for centuries. These included early version of cricket, baseball, golf, football, and bowling, and also foot racing and pitching quoits (similar to tossing horseshoes). Combat sports such as wrestling, boxing, and cudgeling (fighting with sticks), and animal and blood sports – especially bull baiting and cockfighting – also enjoyed great favor.
Table of Contents
- Bodybuilding within the American Sport
- The Notion of Bodybuilding
- Brief History of Bodybuilding and Its First Big Contest
- Bodybuilding Organizations
- Competitions
- Bodybuilding as the Basis to Fundamental Kind of Sport
- Tennis
- Basketball
- Baseball
- Bodybuilding as a Creator of New Kind of Sport
- Armwrestling
- Figure
- Fitness
Orwell said in an essay titled Why I write : “It is my purpose to fuse political purpose and artistic purpose into one whole.”
How far does Orwell achieve this in 1984 ?
« as well as his previous political allegory Animal Farm - is the year of 1984 and it takes place in England exploit, at least according to the Party `s ideology ...» Document abstract
$3.95
4 word format
Language : english
literature
book review
date published
10/10/2006
review : not yet assessed
level : General public
requested 2 times
SummaryLet us remember that, at the end of 1936, Orwell fought for the Republicans (against Franco) in Spain, where he was wounded. We know that Orwell’s 1984 (published in 1949) was given this title because the novel was written in 1948, just after the end of the Second World War and the fall of Hitler’s Nazi regime. At that time, Stalin’s U.S.S.R. still deported the enemies of the Party to gulags and the Cold War between this country and the United States of America had just begun. U.S.S.R would remain the most totalitarian regime till Stalin’s death in 1953.
As Orwell said, ‘every line of serious work that [he has] written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic socialism’.
Considering those facts, how could we doubt that Orwell’s novel 1984 – as well as his previous political allegory Animal Farm – is both a literary masterpiece and a treatise on politics and totalitarianism?
As Orwell said, ‘every line of serious work that [he has] written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic socialism’.
Considering those facts, how could we doubt that Orwell’s novel 1984 – as well as his previous political allegory Animal Farm – is both a literary masterpiece and a treatise on politics and totalitarianism?
Table of Contents
- One of the most political aspects of the book is its original conception of war
- It is also worth noticing that the novel contains many similarities with Stalin's communist regime
- Orwell really intends to show real political life in totalitarian regimes, but its content and style are far from being a political treatise
1
knowledge network
Sort by
Subject :
Type :
Extension :
Language :
Size :