Challenging Underachievement in Boys: A Critical Review of Unreliable and Misinterpreted Data Collection Methods
extension 8 word format
document in English
social sciences social sciences
 
research papers
published 17/04/2008
 
review : Completed
level : Advanced
requested 0 times
 
section Summary
 
 
Raising the achievement level of male pupils, especially disadvantaged males, has been a concern of the UK educational system from several years. Many studies have been conducted using various methods and data sources. The following paper is a critical review of "Challenging Underachievement in Boys" (Lindsay and Muijs, 2006); which was conducted by the authors and the Scrutiny Commission. The researchers use a multilevel model of analysis which has been debated by researchers as to its reliability. In many cases, multilevel models can provide a more realistic approach to problems by analyzing various viewpoints and levels of a given problem which is especially useful when data is missing. Student achievement is a complex issue with many possible influencing factors.
 
 

Table of Contents Challenging Underachievement in Boys: A Critical Review of Unreliable and Misinterpreted Data Collection Methods Table of Contents

 
  1. Introduction
  2. Method Critique.
  3. Results critique of stage one.
  4. Results critique of stage two.
  5. Wide Data Range.
  6. Conclusion.
 
 
section Most downloaded documents over 30 days in social sciences
 
 
 
section Latest in the category social sciences
 
 
 
section From the same author