«Plaintiff Karlene Kincaid alleges that defendant River Bluffs Community College retaliated against her for exercising her First Amendment right to free speech by terminating her employment contract with the college. Plaintiff claims that the letter...» Document abstract
$6.95
7 word format
Language : english
constitutional law
law case
date published
07/12/2007
review : not yet assessed
level : Advanced
requested 1 times
SummaryPlaintiff Karlene Kincaid alleges that defendant River Bluffs Community College retaliated against her for exercising her First Amendment right to free speech by terminating her employment contract with the college. Plaintiff claims that the letter to the editor she wrote and the film she showed to her class are protected activity under the First Amendment. Plaintiff also contends that these protected activities were a “substantial and motivating factor” in defendant’s decision to end the employment relationship.
«Bush v. Gore is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court in many regards. First because of its time constraint (the Electoral College had to meet on December 18th, which gave the Justices very little time to make a major decision), secondly because...» Document abstract
$3.95
4 word format
Language : english
constitutional law
school essay
date published
20/04/2007
review : not yet assessed
level : Advanced
requested 1 times
SummaryBush v. Gore is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court in many regards. First because of its time constraint (the Electoral College had to meet on December 18th, which gave the Justices very little time to make a major decision), secondly because of its tremendous impact (the Court was given the opportunity to influence - if not to determine - the outcome of a Presidential election), and finally because of its content (many felt that the legal reasoning behind the decision had been dictated by a preset choice of outcome).
By looking at those three elements, we will try to understand why Bush v. Gore is such an important and controversial decision. We will then compare the treatment of Bush v. Gore case with the role of the French “Conseil Constitutionnel” as an electoral jurisdiction.
By looking at those three elements, we will try to understand why Bush v. Gore is such an important and controversial decision. We will then compare the treatment of Bush v. Gore case with the role of the French “Conseil Constitutionnel” as an electoral jurisdiction.
Results page: 1
knowledge network
Sort by
Results 1 - 10 out of a total of 2
Subject :
Type :
Extension :
Language :
Size :
Document>constitutional