Comment le "déficit démocratique" de la démocratie représentative suédoise peut-il être surmonté ?
Date de publication :
05/02/2009
Langue :
Anglais
Format :
.doc
Nombre de pages :
4 pages
Sommaire :
Sommaire
- The current situation and problems of the Swedish democracy
- How to narrow the gap between the representatives and the voters
- Direct democracy and participative democracy
Résumé :
The opening article of the Swedish constitution states that "All public power in Sweden derives from the population" But, in a representative democracy, who ends up holding the power?
Actually, direct democracy can't be implemented in a large country. This form of democracy was used in the Antic Greece: the citizens (even if citizenship couldn't be given to the foreigners, the salves and the women) gathered in Assembly of 40 000 members on the Pnix hill to make important decisions by a show of hand. Its competences were significant. But the modern form of democracy is the representative one. The people doesn't rule but through elected representatives. The power is delegated to these representatives who are required to implement democracy in a large country. In this case, the representative is not submitted to the people through an imperative mandate: they can do whatever they want thanks to the representative mandate they enjoy. Their only sanctions will be the no-reelection. The sovereignty is national and no more popular: this means that it can be only exercised through the vote.
Actually, direct democracy can't be implemented in a large country. This form of democracy was used in the Antic Greece: the citizens (even if citizenship couldn't be given to the foreigners, the salves and the women) gathered in Assembly of 40 000 members on the Pnix hill to make important decisions by a show of hand. Its competences were significant. But the modern form of democracy is the representative one. The people doesn't rule but through elected representatives. The power is delegated to these representatives who are required to implement democracy in a large country. In this case, the representative is not submitted to the people through an imperative mandate: they can do whatever they want thanks to the representative mandate they enjoy. Their only sanctions will be the no-reelection. The sovereignty is national and no more popular: this means that it can be only exercised through the vote.
Voir docs similaires : Sciences politiques
1
Quelle place pour les secondes chambres dans les démocraties contemporaines ?
Mémoire | 10/10/2000 | fr | .doc | 16 pages
Dernières nouveautés dans la catégorie : Sciences politiques
2
Les récentes réformes de la protection sociale aux Etats-Unis manifestent-elles un recul du Welfare State ?
Exposé | 04/11/2009 | fr | .doc | 5 pages
Les plus consultés sur 30 jours en : Sciences politiques
3
Les partis politiques et la loi d'airain de l'oligarchie - analyse de la thèse de Roberto Michels
Exposé | 28/12/2006 | fr | .doc | 9 pages
4
Economie des parties et rétribution du militantisme, de Daniel Gaxie
Fiche de lecture | 11/07/2007 | fr | .doc | 5 pages
Les garanties d’oboulo.com :
Comment ca marche ?
Garantie qualité
Satisfait ou remboursé
Paiement sécurisé
Qui sommes nous ?
