«The development of media in the Western Germany during the period of the Allied Occupation (1945-1949) and in the first decade of the Federal Republic (1949-1959)
The media is present all around the world. The media tries to express facts,...» Document abstract
$2.95
3 word format
Language : english
history 1789 to present
presentation
date published
11/12/2006
review : not yet assessed
level : Advanced
requested 5 times
SummaryThe development of media in the Western Germany during the period of the Allied Occupation (1945-1949) and in the first decade of the Federal Republic (1949-1959)
The media is present all around the world. The media tries to express facts, entertainment, opinion, and other information. In this way, newspapers, magazines, cinema films, radio, television, Internet, books, and other forms of publishing are an approach to communication.
Mass media tends to reach a large audience, in particular in the 1920’s with the expansion of radio networks and the mass-circulation of newspapers and magazines.
Western Germany, between 1945 and 1959 can be separated into two periods. The first is the Allied Occupation, started after the defeat of World War II in 1945. Western Germany was divided into three areas. These areas were controlled by America, Britain and France. The Federal Republic -West Germany- was proclaimed in 1949.
What are the main points of the development of media in West Germany while it was emerging from defeat in World War II? How did the media cope with, and what were their attitudes towards the Allied Occupation and the early of the new government –the Federal Republic?
The role of print media and broadcasting (radio and television) were important in the development of media.
The media is present all around the world. The media tries to express facts, entertainment, opinion, and other information. In this way, newspapers, magazines, cinema films, radio, television, Internet, books, and other forms of publishing are an approach to communication.
Mass media tends to reach a large audience, in particular in the 1920’s with the expansion of radio networks and the mass-circulation of newspapers and magazines.
Western Germany, between 1945 and 1959 can be separated into two periods. The first is the Allied Occupation, started after the defeat of World War II in 1945. Western Germany was divided into three areas. These areas were controlled by America, Britain and France. The Federal Republic -West Germany- was proclaimed in 1949.
What are the main points of the development of media in West Germany while it was emerging from defeat in World War II? How did the media cope with, and what were their attitudes towards the Allied Occupation and the early of the new government –the Federal Republic?
The role of print media and broadcasting (radio and television) were important in the development of media.
Table of Contents- After World War II, the Allies wanted to 're-educate' the German population
- The set up of new German Federal Republic in 1949
- The role of print media and broadcasting (radio and television) in the development of media.
The impact of the French Revolution (1789-1815) on social structure, legal system and political life and institutions during the nineteenth century in France
«Some events stamp on the history of mankind forever : the French Revolution is definitely one of these. Indeed, really few upheavals such as this one triggered so many thoughts, comments and passionate reactions all over the world. Although lot of...» Document abstract
$4.95
5 word format
Language : english
history 1789 to present
presentation
date published
21/03/2007
review : not yet assessed
level : Advanced
requested 2 times
SummarySome events stamp on the history of mankind forever : the French Revolution is definitely one of these. Indeed, really few upheavals such as this one triggered so many thoughts, comments and passionate reactions all over the world. Although lot of scholars tried to understand and qualify this period, many interpretations actually remain. This stands for the difficulty to understand the real impact of such an astonishing event.
In reality, these difficulties are deeply rooted in two specific characteristics of the French Revolution : the question of its own intensity, and therefore the question of its real legacy.
to what extent had the French Revolution (1789-1815) a strong and global influence over the nineteenth century in France ?
In reality, these difficulties are deeply rooted in two specific characteristics of the French Revolution : the question of its own intensity, and therefore the question of its real legacy.
to what extent had the French Revolution (1789-1815) a strong and global influence over the nineteenth century in France ?
Table of Contents- The strong intensity of the changes triggered by the French Revolution and global aspects
- Revolution: two-criteria definition
- Evolution of the social structure due to the French Revolution
- The impact of the French Revolution over the French legal system
- Political evolution of France throughout the nineteenth century: the spirit of the Revolution influence
«After World War I, Communism reigned in Russia, which became known as the Soviet Union (USSR). As Karl Marx said, Communism would only be successful if it occurred as a worldwide revolution; thus by its nature, Communism needed to spread. ...» Document abstract
$3.95
4 word format
Language : english
history 1789 to present
term papers
date published
03/05/2007
review : not yet assessed
level : General public
requested 7 times
SummaryAfter World War I, Communism reigned in Russia, which became known as the Soviet Union (USSR). As Karl Marx said, Communism would only be successful if it occurred as a worldwide revolution; thus by its nature, Communism needed to spread. Therefore, after World War II, the Western Allies, primarily England and the United States, granted the Soviet Union all the territories that it had liberated from the Nazis, which included most of Eastern Europe and parts of Central Europe. Very clear spheres of influence were established: Western Europe was heavily influenced by the United States, and its brand of consumerism; whereas Eastern Europe fell behind the Iron Curtain of Communism. Thus, with the creation of the Warsaw Pact in May 1955, the Soviet Union and its satellite states “formed an alliance of ‘friendship, cooperation and mutual assistance’ under a unified command” (Postwar, p. 246). The occupation of the satellite states would last for over forty years, and the Warsaw Pact alliance for more than thirty. However, between 1989 and 1991, Communism in the Soviet Union and its satellites collapsed. Many factors precipitated the fall, including the system’s inability to provide for the consumer needs of its citizens, the very expensive arms race with the US, the rise of opposition movements, such as Solidarity, the oil crisis in the 1970s, citizen’s loss of faith in a Socialist utopia, and military blunders, such as the invasion of Afghanistan. While all of these factors were significant in the collapse of Communism, the system could not have been demolished if Moscow did not allow it to happen (inadvertently or not). Thus, along with many important economic, cultural, and political factors, Mikhail Gorbachev and his programs of non-intervention, glasnost and perestoika allowed the satellite states to break away from the Soviet Union, which in turn led to destabilization in the heart of the Union itself.
Table of Contents- Looking at the economic situation in the USSR
- These consumer problems were exacerbated by the oil crisis in the 1970s
- Another factor that contributed to the Soviet Union's demise
- One of Gorbachev's most important reforms
- Poland is a good example of how distinct cultural issues crippled Communism
- The Communist party in Poland was losing power
- Gorbachev's policy of non-intervention in satellite states
- The fall of Communism yielded many serious consequences
- The catastrophe at Chernobyl is just one example of the environmental disasters of the Soviet system
«World War Two left Europe war torn and destitute. Over 30 million people had been “uprooted, transplanted, expelled, deported and dispersed…in the years 1939-43” (Judt, Postwar, p. 23). Many cities were completely destroyed including Minsk, Royan,...» Document abstract
$2.95
3 word format
Language : english
history 1789 to present
term papers
date published
03/05/2007
review : not yet assessed
level : General public
requested 8 times
SummaryWorld War Two left Europe war torn and destitute. Over 30 million people had been “uprooted, transplanted, expelled, deported and dispersed…in the years 1939-43” (Judt, Postwar, p. 23). Many cities were completely destroyed including Minsk, Royan, Le Havre, Hamburg, Cologne, Warsaw, and thousands of others (p. 16-17). Industry and agriculture were hard hit, which contributed to the need for food rationing because there was not enough food to feed Europe. This war was without a doubt a total war, in the sense that nothing was sacred or safe from the war machine. An example of the effects of this total war can be seen in the number of civilian casualties: “The numbers of civilian dead exceeded military losses in the USSR, Hungary, Poland, Yugoslavia, Greece, France, the Netherlands, Belgium and Norway” (p. 18). Thus, this war wreaked havoc not only on the physical landscape of Europe, but also on the psyche of Europeans: Europe would never be the same. In order to deal with this intense trauma and its ensuing consequences, Europe repatriated millions of refugees and displaced persons, many Western European countries instituted social welfare programs, and some countries created myths about the war in order to help their countries heal.
Table of Contents- During WWII, Hitler fought a racial war in order to 'protect' Germany's racial purity
- Because of the Holocaust, there were few Jews left in Europe
- Another by-product of the war was the creation of welfare states
- World War Two represented a key turning point for France
- The Soviet Union suffered the worst casualties of the war, losing over 30 million people
- After the war ended, Stalin claimed all of the territory that the Red Army had liberated as part of the Soviet sphere of influence
- Germany's postwar experience was different than the Allied nations' experiences
- World War Two left a deep wound in Europe both metaphorically and physically
«In October 1998, Yeltsin defeated his opponents by military force and thus communicated a clear message about both his power and his resolve to achieve his objectives. After this, he presented a new institutional design for organizing politics in...» Document abstract
$3.95
4 word format
Language : english
history 1789 to present
summaries
date published
07/05/2007
review : not yet assessed
level : General public
requested 5 times
SummaryIn October 1998, Yeltsin defeated his opponents by military force and thus communicated a clear message about both his power and his resolve to achieve his objectives. After this, he presented a new institutional design for organizing politics in Russia. His enemies as well as the population as a whole had to decide whether to accept or reject the rules. To hasten their decision making, Yeltsin called for new elections and a referendum on the constitution balance of power within Russia. A fear existed that those who rejected the new rules would suffer the consequences. Politicians had to decide if they wanted to express their discontent through a political system created by Yeltsin or if they wanted to go off on their own and not participate. Every choice was a tactical move.
Yeltsin’s new super-presidential system promised to fuel polarization. Some predicted civil war and others foresaw fascism. Russia’s major political actors decided to participate in parliamentary elections in 1993 and 1995, and most importantly in presidential elections in 1996. But why did they decide to acquiesce to the electoral process? First, the factors that had impeded the emergence of new political institutions in the first two periods were not as salient in a period between 1985-1993. The new second factor was a clarified balance of power between opposing political forces. And the third factor, path dependency, is also brought into analysis. These new political rules stuck because an increasing number of political actors found it in their interests to abide by them. The cost of rejecting the rules was much greater than just abiding by them.
This chapter traces the evolution of electoralism as a feature of the Russian political system by discussing the three elections, 1993, 1995, and 1996, in brief. The aim is not to explain the electoral outcomes but rather to explain why participants agreed to play the electoral game. However, the outcomes of these elections constitute a central component of this explanation about institutional consolidation and therefore are discussed within this context.
Yeltsin’s new super-presidential system promised to fuel polarization. Some predicted civil war and others foresaw fascism. Russia’s major political actors decided to participate in parliamentary elections in 1993 and 1995, and most importantly in presidential elections in 1996. But why did they decide to acquiesce to the electoral process? First, the factors that had impeded the emergence of new political institutions in the first two periods were not as salient in a period between 1985-1993. The new second factor was a clarified balance of power between opposing political forces. And the third factor, path dependency, is also brought into analysis. These new political rules stuck because an increasing number of political actors found it in their interests to abide by them. The cost of rejecting the rules was much greater than just abiding by them.
This chapter traces the evolution of electoralism as a feature of the Russian political system by discussing the three elections, 1993, 1995, and 1996, in brief. The aim is not to explain the electoral outcomes but rather to explain why participants agreed to play the electoral game. However, the outcomes of these elections constitute a central component of this explanation about institutional consolidation and therefore are discussed within this context.
Table of Contents- Introduction
- Yeltsin's new super-presidential system promised to fuel polarization
- This chapter traces the evolution of electoralism as a feature of the Russian political system
- The 1993 Elections
- The democrats decided to act as several different parties rather than one united bloc
- Nationalist leaders and organizations also had to decide whether to add legitimacy to Yeltsin's actions by participating in his elections
- At the start of the 1993 parliamentary elections, everyone assumed that Russia's Choice would prevail
- Beyond the narrow focus on the legitimacy of the new constitution, the fact that the elections occurred at all helped consolidate new political practices in Russia
- The 1995 Parliamentary Elections
- Debates still raged about the kind of economic system Russia needed but only the most radical communists still pushed for the return to the Soviet Union
- Compared with the results of 1993, the results of the 1995 elections produced few surprises.
- The 1996 Presidential Election
- The 1996 presidential election provided the ultimate test for the new political rules of the Second Russian Republic
- The election, according to some, could destabilize Russia
- Conclusion
«Salman Rushdie has been in hiding for over a decade due to assassins who are out searching for him because of his “anti-Islamic blasphemy, belief and disbelief, anti-Thatcher politics, and pro-Western propaganda” (Kuortti 1999: 15). Even though...» Document abstract
$2.95
3 word format
Language : english
history 1789 to present
school essay
date published
07/05/2007
review : not yet assessed
level : General public
requested 19 times
SummarySalman Rushdie has been in hiding for over a decade due to assassins who are out searching for him because of his “anti-Islamic blasphemy, belief and disbelief, anti-Thatcher politics, and pro-Western propaganda” (Kuortti 1999: 15). Even though Iranian leader, Khomeini, who initially established the fatwa on Rushdie, has died, leaders have left a money reward on his life for his controversial novels that radically display his strong historical and political critiques on South Asian and the Middle Eastern countries. Author Damian Grant believes that Rushdie would be “…best seen as a critic rather than a novelist at all” due to the upheavals provoked by his opinionated writings (Grant 1998: 41).
One of his first novels, Midnight’s Children, directs its attentions towards India around the time of Pakistan’s succession. The story is narrated by a Bombay-native named Saleem Sinai who was born on August 15, 1947, the day of India’s independence from Britain. He possesses magical abilities that link him mentally (and ably) to the group of Indian children born on the same day as he was; they are called midnight’s children. Their life experiences seemingly change (and are changed by) India. The entire novel is a commentary of India’s historical and political status according to Rusdhie. But what does Salman Rushdie have to say about India? What specific criticisms does he make regarding India’s known history? How does he use Saleem’s story to portray his opinions on India’s known past? What are some of the responses to his novel and views of India, and how does he defend himself? Finally, are his points valid enough to be integrated into how India and its past are viewed by outsiders, or how it views itself?
One of his first novels, Midnight’s Children, directs its attentions towards India around the time of Pakistan’s succession. The story is narrated by a Bombay-native named Saleem Sinai who was born on August 15, 1947, the day of India’s independence from Britain. He possesses magical abilities that link him mentally (and ably) to the group of Indian children born on the same day as he was; they are called midnight’s children. Their life experiences seemingly change (and are changed by) India. The entire novel is a commentary of India’s historical and political status according to Rusdhie. But what does Salman Rushdie have to say about India? What specific criticisms does he make regarding India’s known history? How does he use Saleem’s story to portray his opinions on India’s known past? What are some of the responses to his novel and views of India, and how does he defend himself? Finally, are his points valid enough to be integrated into how India and its past are viewed by outsiders, or how it views itself?
Table of Contents- One of his first novels, Midnight's Children, directs its attentions towards India around the time of Pakistan's succession
- It is well known that Salman Rushdie writes his novel Midnight's Children in the form of magical realism
- Rushdie explores the idea that India's history was not 'real' until after the British Raj ended
- To Rushdie, then, India seems to be historically a magical place because that is how it has been perceived by people
- Rushdie claims that the deception of memory has created inaccurate retellings of previous times in India
- Rushdie's distrust in India and the country's ability to maintain an accurate and realistic history could be seen as offensive
- He acknowledges that his novel will not be accepted by everyone in India because it is 'against the grain?,
«Deciding on the one aspect in all of human history that I would change is certainly a difficult question. I thought of terrorism, the Holocaust, war, conquest, and slavery first. The two aspects these have in common are violence and injustice....» Document abstract
$1.95
1 word format
Language : english
history 1789 to present
school essay
date published
22/08/2007
review : not yet assessed
level : Advanced
requested 7 times
SummaryDeciding on the one aspect in all of human history that I would change is certainly a difficult question. I thought of terrorism, the Holocaust, war, conquest, and slavery first. The two aspects these have in common are violence and injustice. Eliminating violence and injustice would erase most of the terrible occurrences of human history, but I suppose those subjects are too broad and impossible to erase from human nature. If I had to choose one of the above to eliminate forever, I would pick slavery.
Table of Contents«When the first Africans were taken from their homeland to be sold into bondage in the Americas, their religion was left behind with their freedom back in Africa. Their native religions, as well as their languages and various other aspects of...» Document abstract
$1.95
2 word format
Language : english
history 1789 to present
school essay
date published
22/08/2007
review : not yet assessed
level : Advanced
requested 4 times
SummaryWhen the first Africans were taken from their homeland to be sold into bondage in the Americas, their religion was left behind with their freedom back in Africa. Their native religions, as well as their languages and various other aspects of culture, were banned from practice in the New World, with Christianity and English imposed upon them as substitutes. As portrayed by Frederick Douglass and Harriet Jacobs in their respective slave narratives, Christianity served as a weapon of suppression for slave owners in the antebellum South. However, instead of accepting Christianity as justification for slavery in America, slaves made the religion their own, interpreting Christianity as support for the freedom and equality of all people.
Table of Contents- Once slavery was instituted in America, Christianity was used for religious arguments for its existence
- Women in slavery like the one Douglass describes suffered even greater wrongdoings at the hands of their masters than male slaves
- Douglass' narrative features another slave woman that suffers greatly for the sake of her master's reward
- The Christianity that Douglass and other slaves adopted emphasized what they believed were the meanings of the teachings of Jesus that they had learned
- When slaves needed a unifying ideology that justified their freedom from exploitation, they had to look no further than the religion imposed on them
«Racism has existed since the beginning of time. People have fought hundreds of wars in the name of racial superiority. Racial differences come between almost all people at some point, be it in war or in every day life. Robert Abzug’s Inside the...» Document abstract
$2.95
3 word format
Language : english
history 1789 to present
school essay
date published
28/08/2007
review : not yet assessed
level : Advanced
requested 5 times
Summary Racism has existed since the beginning of time. People have fought hundreds of wars in the name of racial superiority. Racial differences come between almost all people at some point, be it in war or in every day life. Robert Abzug’s Inside the Vicious Heart and Philip Caputo’s A Rumor of War exemplify the racial differences that occurred as a result of the Holocaust and the Vietnam War. These events were based on racial discrimination and events that led to a new racial hatred.
The Holocaust was spurred by the Nazi hatred for all those who they believed to be inferior to them. Many races were victims of the Holocaust: Jews, Polish, Hungarians, Czechoslovakians, Ukrainians, Russians, French, Gypsies, and even some Germans.
The Holocaust was spurred by the Nazi hatred for all those who they believed to be inferior to them. Many races were victims of the Holocaust: Jews, Polish, Hungarians, Czechoslovakians, Ukrainians, Russians, French, Gypsies, and even some Germans.
Table of Contents- The Holocaust was spurred by the Nazi hatred for all those who they believed to be inferior to them
- Over time, after American soldiers infiltrated the camps, the news spread of the true, real life mass burials, the mass murders in crematoriums and gas chambers, and the full out genocide that was going on in Germany
- If nothing else, Americans had a hard time dealing with the German guards who remained at the camps.
- Caputo's A Rumor of War reveals another type of racism that can develop as a result of war.
- In the finals months of his time in Vietnam, Caputo became enraged with two young VC.
«The transition to a cash economy along with the increasing antislavery movement ensured that nineteenth century America would become economically and politically changed. However, the second Great Awakening ensured that principles of the past would...» Document abstract
$2.95
3 word format
Language : english
history 1789 to present
research papers
date published
30/08/2007
review : not yet assessed
level : Expert
requested 3 times
SummaryThe transition to a cash economy along with the increasing antislavery movement ensured that nineteenth century America would become economically and politically changed. However, the second Great Awakening ensured that principles of the past would remain constant and stronger than ever and white middle-class ladies were the main target. The emphasis on religion reaffirmed women as pious and virtuous beings. The idea of such middle-class virtue encompassed meticulously-run households and submissiveness to the dominant male figure of the house; the driving force behind such obedience derived from the belief in projecting morality at all times.
Table of Contents- Nineteenth century American women embraced their role in housework because they perceived it as imperative in overseeing their families' well-being
- Eventually, women's contributions were no longer limited to their households, but extended to moralizing society
- In further pursuit of the ideal, white, middle-class women united to combat another immoral societal injustice
- However, some could argue that for nineteenth century women, pleasing their husbands proved more important than pleasing God
- While the middle-class ideal encompassed obedience and taking pride in housework, it was not limited to the household
knowledge network