Presidential association: Effective strategy in the Bob Casey Pennsylvania Senate Campaign
$5.95
political science
presentation
published 01/09/2008
review : Completed
level : General public
requested 0 times
Of all the competitive races of the 2006-midterm elections, the Pennsylvania Senate race between Bob Casey Jr. and Rick Santorum stood at the top of the list of elections that would prove to have serious implications in deciding the partisan majority of the Senate. Although the race was characterized by many of the common aspects of campaign wars and election politics such as negative attack ads, the building of grassroots support bases and the use of get out the vote tactics, one of the most notable strategies of the race was Bob Caseys use of speeches and media ads to create an association between incumbent Rick Santorum and President Bush in the minds of potential voters. This strategy would prove to be ingenious as it perfectly catered to the sentiments of the majority of the potential voters who sought to make the 2006-midterm elections a referendum on President Bush himself (Eberhart). By establishing an almost unbreakable bond between the President and Mr. Santorum, the Casey camp intended for voters to be able to use their vote for Casey and against Santorum as a direct critique of the Presidents performance
Table of Contents
- Introduction.
- Casey's use of media and public speeches to attach direct connections between incumbent Rick Santorum and President Bush.
- Casey's prime method of creating mental association.
- Casey's tactic of associating Bush with Santorum.
- Conclusion.
