La protection des informateurs aux Etats-Unis
Date de publication :
19/09/2009
Langue :
French
Format :
.doc
Nombre de pages :
1 page
Sommaire :
Sommaire
- The legal protection of whistleblowers
- The difficulty of this kind of legislation
Résumé :
First it can be useful to explain what mean whistleblower. In the dictionary we can find this signification: "A whistleblower is a person who alleges misconduct". Whistleblowers may report the misconduct the lawyers, the media or state or federal agencies.
In France everyone know that this process can be very dangerous for the both sides: it is dangerous for the whistleblowers who can for example be sacked of their job or lose a trial for defamation and be financially condemned. But people can also be a victim of a whistleblower. One of the biggest judicial mistake show this problem, it was in 2003 when children and their parents charge people with sexual violence, it was the Outreau trial.
In one hand we have to protect whistleblowers when they say the truth, but in the other hand we can't always protect them because they can also lie. Do you believe whistleblowers are sufficiently protected under US law or is it still an act of tremendous courage to speak out ?
In France everyone know that this process can be very dangerous for the both sides: it is dangerous for the whistleblowers who can for example be sacked of their job or lose a trial for defamation and be financially condemned. But people can also be a victim of a whistleblower. One of the biggest judicial mistake show this problem, it was in 2003 when children and their parents charge people with sexual violence, it was the Outreau trial.
In one hand we have to protect whistleblowers when they say the truth, but in the other hand we can't always protect them because they can also lie. Do you believe whistleblowers are sufficiently protected under US law or is it still an act of tremendous courage to speak out ?
Voir docs similaires : Droit civil
Dernières nouveautés dans la catégorie : Droit civil
3
Assemblée plénière de la Cour de cassation, 23 février 2001 - la responsabilité du juge
Commentaire d'arrêt | 22/09/2009 | fr | .doc | 4 pages
4
Deuxième chambre civile de la Cour de Cassation, 22 février 2007 - une personne en arrêt maladie est-elle obligée d'avoir l'accord de la Caisse primaire d'assurance maladie pour quitter son domicile si cet accord est déjà donné par le médecin
Commentaire d'arrêt | 22/09/2009 | fr | .doc | 3 pages
5
Cour de Cassation, 19 février 1997 et 18 mai 2000 - les conditions de l'indemnisation des victimes d'accidents de la circulation : le cas de l'implication d'un véhicule
Commentaire d'arrêt | 20/09/2009 | fr | .doc | 2 pages
Les plus consultés sur 30 jours en : Droit civil
1
Arrêt Jacques Vabre, Cour de Cassation, Chambre Mixte, 24 mai 1975
Commentaire d'arrêt | 28/12/2007 | fr | .rtf | 3 pages
3
Commentaire d'arrêt du 26 novembre 2003 - Alain Manoukian rupture fautive des pourparlers
Commentaire d'arrêt | 15/01/2006 | fr | .doc | 4 pages
5
Procès-verbal de réception des travaux avec état des réserves
Contrat type | 22/09/2006 | fr | .doc | 2 pages
Les garanties d’oboulo.com :
Comment ca marche ?
Garantie qualité
Satisfait ou remboursé
Paiement sécurisé
Qui sommes nous ?
