« Samantha Adams The Greatest Human Conflict In The Country Husband, John Cheever introduces us to Francis Weed, a passive country man who leads a lackluster life ...» Document abstract
$2.95
literature
school essay
date published
13/09/2007
review : not yet assessed
level : Expert
requested 3 times
In The Country Husband, John Cheever introduces us to Francis Weed, a passive country man who leads a lackluster life. The story begins with a plane crashan event that should be traumatizing and life-altering. However, Frances Weed hardly has a reaction to this frightening setting. He is truly a monument to apathy. Ironically, the crash is not the catalyst for the series of dramatized moments that gradually change his character; instead, his encounters with women stir his dormant emotions. Descriptions of the setting within each of these experiences reflect this sudden awakening. His memories, dreams, and newfound love seem to manifest every atmosphere. Unfortunately, the superficiality of his town stifles any emotion his experiences garner. He eventually must make a choice all humans facewhether to employ these changes in perceiving the settings of every day life, or to simply suppress them. Francis reactions to the elements of setting in his world reflect the transformations in his character.
- The story opens with a gloomy, surreal description of the sky when Francis is onboard the plane
- Despite the magnitude of a plane crash, the first significant change within Francis occurs at a typical social gathering
- The people in the Farquarsons' living room seemed united in their tacit claim that there had been no past, no war'.the atmosphere of Shady Hill made the memory unseemly and impolite.?
- Francis initially internalizes this powerful change that Anne triggers. As he lay in bed, she consumes his thoughts.
- Of course, such an emotional high is as fleeting as a daydream of a snow-covered mountain
- Francis discovers the ultimate downfall in his emotional change when he learns that Anne is engaged to be married to an unlikable neighborhood boy, Clayton
« of new factors which can lead to conflict and violence Page 91] Paris, Roland, Human Security - Paradigm Adam Smith highlighted that the greatest improvement in ...» Document abstract
$5.95
international relations
worksheets
date published
19/10/2004
review : not yet assessed
level : Expert
requested 24 times
The end of Cold War brought new global challenges to the security field. The arousal of new forms of conflict, such as internal wars and terrorism made it important to rethink civilian protection as the centre of this new perspective of security. Threats to security are no longer restricted to states, nor can the state protect its citizens from fear by conventional military action. In his speech appealing for a change in the way we think about security, Sergio Vieira de Mello , underlined the idea that « the security of states and the security of peoples are clearly intertwined, for the insecurity of peoples inexorably leads to the disintegration of states and to regional and international instability »...
- Human Security: a difficult definition.
- Human Security and Human Rights.
- Human Security and Human Development.
« of human rights, and to solve any potential conflict between two cultural relativism as a shield to justify the greatest violations of human rights. ...» Document abstract
$9.95
international law
presentation
date published
16/11/2001
review : not yet assessed
level : Advanced
requested 39 times
We'll see that a mediate position can be found between what Donnelly has identified as radical cultural relativism (a) and radical universalism (b). Thus, it seems that a cross-cultural consensus can be found on the universality of some basic rights contained in the UDHR, whereas some other articles may be susceptible of cultural adaptation. But in the first place we will examine the position of cultural relativists and its potential weaknesses and hidden rationals
- The UDHR is a Western conception of human rights (the claim for cultural relativism)
- Human rights: a Western invention
- Human rights as opposed to duties and collective mechanisms
- The accusation of cultural imperialism
- The issue of the hierarchy of rights within the UDHR
- The necessary respect for cultural diversity
- Striving for universalism (the defenders of the UDHR)
- The hidden side of cultural relativism
- The accommodation of universal rights in a non-Western cultural context: the case of Islamic countries
- A way out: 'relative universality' and the recognition of basic rights
« Adrian Furnham found that the greatest relationship satisfaction "Sources of Satisfaction and Conflict in Long Cross-Cultural Study of Human Sexuality." Annual ...» Document abstract
$3.95
social sciences
presentation
date published
02/10/2007
review : not yet assessed
level : General public
requested 0 times
Love has played a significant role in peoples lives since they have been able to acknowledge it. Romance appears in almost all aspects of human life from entertainment to politics to business to childrens movies. As soon as children can read, write, speak, and understand the world around them, they learn about familial love, friendship, and, most importantly, romantic love. Through romantic love, people resolve problems with parents, find comfort and security, express trust and distrust for the world at large, and answer needs from childhood.
- Love has played a significant role in people's lives since they have been able to acknowledge it.
- Biology plays a significant role in determining whom people will fall in love with.
- Outside of biology, however, personal preferences and personalities play an even greater role in determining if a relationship will form and of what kind.
- Childhood can also play a significant part in what someone looks for in a mate.
- Once both sides of a couple focus their energies on the relationship, it begins to deepen and love begins to form.
- Quite often, whether a relationship stays together or not depends on the surrounding society.
- Whom a person falls in love with and how that relationship progresses directly reflects on the two individuals involved. Ayn Rand sums love up as 'our response to our highest values?
« rebellious daughter and Arnold, an older man without the greatest intentions at himself conflict. but rather the words and mind of another human being, Arnold. ...» Document abstract
$1.95
journalism
presentation
date published
28/09/2007
review : not yet assessed
level : General public
requested 2 times
The difference between literary fiction and commercial writing is an interesting contrast played out by many fiction writers. Literary fiction is known to be a more intelligent type of writing. The author usually includes in the story several underlying themes or subplots, trying to teach us something through the way they write. Commercial fiction plays more to the storybook plot and ending. It almost always ends with the happy ending and there usually is only one overriding theme throughout the story. The theme almost always plays on a famous motif, such as What goes around comes around. Literary and commercial writing are two separate ways to write fiction and its quite evident when reading the short stories Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been and the Storm that the differences between these forms of writing are more than what appears on the surface.
- The difference between literary fiction and commercial writing is an interesting contrast played out by many fiction writers
- In contrast the story 'Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been' written by Bob Dylan has a centrally man vs. man conflict.
- When reading 'The Storm' moral values are characterized in several different ways
- Contrasting 'The Storm', is the dealing of morals in 'Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?.
- One reading is all it takes to be satisfied and to have gathered and contained all the necessary information in 'Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?.
- The differences between literary and commercial fiction, while wide, don't make one way of writing better then another.
« now be "used to imply the greatest degree of this tenet to the lives of actual human beings ("Personal justifiable and do not necessarily conflict with survival ...» Document abstract
$1.95
linguistics
presentation
date published
07/08/2007
review : not yet assessed
level : Advanced
requested 5 times
I intend to explicate Derek Parfits view regarding personal identity as nothing more than non-branching psychological continuity. I will be brief in my discussion to avoid redundancy, as I have more deeply explicated Parfits infamous view in my previous paper, Parfits View of Personal Identity. Further, I will discuss the vast implications of Parfits view of persons as a series of psychologically continuous selves related by differing degrees of psychological connectedness. I will defend Parfits identification of psychological continuity as the criterion for personal identity. However, in defending the basic theory, I will argue that the psychologically continuous successive selves that constitute a person will typically never be as distantly related as Parfit implies. Therefore, I will argue further that the prevailing beliefs of persons that Parfit himself identifies as susceptible to his view are in fact mostly compatible with his view, and therefore, additional evidence for a Parfitian view of personal identity.
- In his essay 'Personal Identity,' Parfit discusses his infamous view of a person as a series of psychologically continuous selves
- However, human behavior suggests there is a substantive self underneath
- The implications of Parfit's view of the nature of persons are greatly unsettling and even disturbing
- Generally, most persons maintain a much greater degree of psychological connectedness to their former selves than the amnesiac
- However, Parfit excessively discounts the role of instinct in this irrational fear
- They typically closely psychologically resemble the criminal earlier selves that were originally incarcerated, although there are of course, exceptions
« One of IA's greatest achievements was the release of "Conflict and Peace in West Africa." Nov 2006. "Conference Report: Conflicts and the Human Security in ...» Document abstract
$7.95
international relations
presentation
date published
19/04/2008
review : not yet assessed
level : General public
requested 0 times
Overview
After the Cold War the majority of wars in Africa were "societal" while conflict between states was considerably rare. The inter-state wars were further prolonged and worsened by foreign support. Military assistance on part of Western and Socialist countries is one of the common outside causes for many of the ethnic and inter-communal conflicts in several African regions (Marshall, 2005; Pollard & Odo, 2004).
Key Words- Conflicts, West Africa, Senegal, Guinea-Bissau, Nigeria, Sierra Leone, Cote d'Ivoire, Liberia
Case Study: Sierra Leone, RUF, Foday Saybana Sankoh, APC, The Abidjan Process, ECOMOG, AFRC-RUF, The Lome Agreement, ECOWAS, UNOMIL
After the Cold War the majority of wars in Africa were "societal" while conflict between states was considerably rare. The inter-state wars were further prolonged and worsened by foreign support. Military assistance on part of Western and Socialist countries is one of the common outside causes for many of the ethnic and inter-communal conflicts in several African regions (Marshall, 2005; Pollard & Odo, 2004).
Key Words- Conflicts, West Africa, Senegal, Guinea-Bissau, Nigeria, Sierra Leone, Cote d'Ivoire, Liberia
Case Study: Sierra Leone, RUF, Foday Saybana Sankoh, APC, The Abidjan Process, ECOMOG, AFRC-RUF, The Lome Agreement, ECOWAS, UNOMIL
- Overview.
- Conflict Trends in West Africa.
- The Roots of Conflicts.
- Case Study: Sierra Leone.
- Conflict Background.
- The Abidjan Process (1995-1996).
- ECOMOG.
- The Lome Agreement.
- What Went Wrong?
- Case Study: Liberia.
- Conflict Background.
- The Peace Process.
« has been hailed as one of the greatest discourses on a Heavenly level, is a theory in direct conflict with the It is human to love, whether it is in the Common ...» Document abstract
$1.95
literature
school essay
date published
19/10/2007
review : not yet assessed
level : Advanced
requested 0 times
There is a lot to be said about love. It saturates literature, Hollywood, every means of creative output known to the history of this planet. There is something mysterious about it, something undiscovered. So desperate have populations been to answer the timeless questions of love that it can bring a group of men to a single meeting place to discuss the darkest regions of the heart and psyche. Platos Symposium has been hailed as one of the greatest discourses on love ever written. The language, the imagery, it contains quotes and stories that are so embedded in modern thought that they could never be separated again. The dialogue basically serves as a competition between philosophy and poetry; the premise is that the former is correctly educated in the ways of love while the latter is misguided. Symposium is not just an exploration of love; it is an exploration of what it means to be human. The speeches delivered in the honor of Eros go beyond mere contrast. They are used to chronicle one mans flawed desire for immortality.
- There is a precise formula to the way in which Plato sets the scene of Symposium.
- The first speech is delivered by Phaedrus.
- Eryximachus follows, and not only does he remain honest to the ways of humanity, he is the first of the men to take a stance on love that directly reflects his view on life as a whole.
- The most famous of all the speeches in Symposium is given by Aristophanes.
- Socrates continues his negative views on love in his long-awaited speech.
- A contrast between what it means to be human and what it means to be immortal develops throughout Symposium.
« to those on the `other' side of a conflict. group ideology obliterates the individual human conscience" and a "mechanism for rationalizing the greatest evil of ...» Document abstract
$8.95
humanities/philosophy
presentation
date published
02/10/2007
review : not yet assessed
level : Advanced
requested 0 times
War is a situation that embodies the principle of duality: one side is pitted against another in an an act of violence intended to compel an opponent to fulfill our will . That will, whatever it may be, has its root in a political object that is determined within ideological constraints. This pattern is corroborated by conclusions determined by other human endeavors. Psychologically speaking, perception precedes action; philosophically, ontology precedes ethics, and politically, ideology precedes war. As the soldier-cum-philosopher of war Clausewitz muses, Is not War merely another kind of writing and language for political thoughts? .
- However, neither militarism nor pacifism describe monolithic entities; both terms connote sets of ideologies under which many subsets exist
- Both pacifism and eschatological militarism assume religious significance within a political context
- In order to be examined as an ideology in general, it is useful to first divorce pacifism from any specific religious formulations, and analyze it in its ideal philosophical form.
- The Fourteenth Dalai Lama, exiled religious and political leader of Tibet, explains that According to Buddhist psychology, most of our troubles are due to our passionate desire for and attachment to things that we misapprehend as enduring entities
- In reaction to the brutal occupation that followed, armed elements of the Tibetan population were actually trained by the CIA, which hoped to use the Tibetan cause to fight against Communist China.
- If pacifism has failed in the example of Tibet, it has much to do with Phillips' critique of pacifism as a means of engaging in conflict.
- The history of religious pacifisms does not end with the ideally pacifist example of Buddhism.
- The pacifist impulse thus exists at the root of both Eastern and Western faiths
Sort by
Subject :
Type :
Extension :
Language :
Size :
