«Consumerism culture enabled the counterculture search for pleasure to evolve.. Universities have succumbed to the market's demands - Grades have softened.. ...» Document abstract
$3.95
4 word format
Language : english
economics
presentation
date published
20/04/2008
review : not yet assessed
level : General public
requested 0 times
Summary“Education is not a preparation for the future, it is the future itself,” Read my bold shopping bag from the University Store. It was the first week of school, and nearly every fresh student was proudly sporting one of these bags, oblivious to the notion that their education is subjected to the same economic forces as the store they had just visited. The modernist perspective, which the majority of universities have been founded upon, maintains that language, reason, and the scientific method are the foremost mechanism for arriving at the truth (Delluchi 2002). As tuition increases however, students regard education less as an opportunity for personal growth via the acquisition of reason, and more often as a financial investment, which they expect to be returned with interest. As Barry Schwartz argues in “The Debasing of Education,” thinking about education economically encourages students to view it instrumentally, thus shifting the student-teacher relationship to that of a customer.
key words- student cusomers, laissez faire
key words- student cusomers, laissez faire
Table of Contents
- Consumerism culture enabled the counterculture search for pleasure to evolve.
- Universities have succumbed to the market's demands - Grades have softened.
- The true effects of these changes however, can be observed in classrooms.
- Student consumerism, an attitude that treats the university as a place to meet pre-established needs.
- Education is regarded as a precious common resource such as the environment.
« United States, and its brand of consumerism; whereas Eastern 42.3 work-hours in Moscow, despite high levels of announced that it was raising the price of meat ...» Document abstract
$3.95
4 word format
Language : english
history 1789 to present
term papers
date published
03/05/2007
review : not yet assessed
level : General public
requested 7 times
SummaryAfter World War I, Communism reigned in Russia, which became known as the Soviet Union (USSR). As Karl Marx said, Communism would only be successful if it occurred as a worldwide revolution; thus by its nature, Communism needed to spread. Therefore, after World War II, the Western Allies, primarily England and the United States, granted the Soviet Union all the territories that it had liberated from the Nazis, which included most of Eastern Europe and parts of Central Europe. Very clear spheres of influence were established: Western Europe was heavily influenced by the United States, and its brand of consumerism; whereas Eastern Europe fell behind the Iron Curtain of Communism. Thus, with the creation of the Warsaw Pact in May 1955, the Soviet Union and its satellite states “formed an alliance of ‘friendship, cooperation and mutual assistance’ under a unified command” (Postwar, p. 246). The occupation of the satellite states would last for over forty years, and the Warsaw Pact alliance for more than thirty. However, between 1989 and 1991, Communism in the Soviet Union and its satellites collapsed. Many factors precipitated the fall, including the system’s inability to provide for the consumer needs of its citizens, the very expensive arms race with the US, the rise of opposition movements, such as Solidarity, the oil crisis in the 1970s, citizen’s loss of faith in a Socialist utopia, and military blunders, such as the invasion of Afghanistan. While all of these factors were significant in the collapse of Communism, the system could not have been demolished if Moscow did not allow it to happen (inadvertently or not). Thus, along with many important economic, cultural, and political factors, Mikhail Gorbachev and his programs of non-intervention, glasnost and perestoika allowed the satellite states to break away from the Soviet Union, which in turn led to destabilization in the heart of the Union itself.
Table of Contents
- Looking at the economic situation in the USSR
- These consumer problems were exacerbated by the oil crisis in the 1970s
- Another factor that contributed to the Soviet Union's demise
- One of Gorbachev's most important reforms
- Poland is a good example of how distinct cultural issues crippled Communism
- The Communist party in Poland was losing power
- Gorbachev's policy of non-intervention in satellite states
- The fall of Communism yielded many serious consequences
- The catastrophe at Chernobyl is just one example of the environmental disasters of the Soviet system
1
knowledge network
Sort by
Subject :
Type :
Extension :
Language :
Size :