The Politics of Reticence and Paralysis
$5.95
literature
presentation
published 21/08/2007
review : Completed
level : Advanced
requested 1 times
Why are we sometimes unable to speak to others? In our societies, why are we sometimes unable to communicate or, communicate truthfully or effectively? We are thrown into cities, lets say, teeming with unimportant people, blank faces, uncaring, hurrying, where sounds of movement and presence drown out sounds of communication speech, dialogue, laughter. Perhaps we ride an elevator, one in a group who stares at ascending numbers, or likewise on the bus, we stare forward, conscious of the tension of silence.
Table of Contents
- Why are we sometimes unable to speak to others?
- This conceit of social alienation is evident in many modern and early-modern fiction narratives
- Connell's main character, Mrs. Bridge, is depicted as passive person from the beginning of the narrative
- Bridge is alienated from the person that she is (traditionally) supposed to be closest to
- He'd tried to pull off a trick that couldn't be done, which was to remake himself, to vanish what was past and replace it with things good and new
- In Jesus' Son, Johnson's main character and narrator, Fuckhead is similarly alienated from both his wife and the people he encounters
- Can this even be considered an attempt at a consolatory action?
- Despite the fact that John Wade is a politician and, necessarily, ambitious and successful in the public sphere, he is nonetheless an indecisive character, who is both muted and paralyzed
- This kind of voiceless character is a mode of modern fiction
