The Epileptic Loophole: Self-control and the Judiciary in Dostoevskys The Brothers Karamazov
$2.95
literature
presentation
published 03/06/2008
review : not yet assessed
level : Advanced
requested 0 times
Epilepsy and the punitive systemtwo seemingly unrelated items that Fyodor Dostoevsky juxtaposes in order to make a point about Russia and the futility of the judiciary. In his giant oeuvre The Brothers Karamazov, Dostoevsky exemplifies the tension between rational and irrational behavior by putting Dmitri Karamazov and Pavel Smerdyakov at trial. Though they are to a large extent very different, both have something in common: their actions and thoughts are somewhat out of their control. It seems that impulses often govern the course of their lives. Interestingly, the epileptic Smerdyakov has an incredibly ironic function in the novel; his condition should render him an impulsive mess, subject to unpredictable fits, but he is often more successful at achieving his ends and keeping his disease under his own control than Dmitri. Ultimately, the ironic contrast between Dmitris impulsivity and Smerdyakovs rationality is crucial in conveying Dostoevskys message that the judicial system and, by extension, the Russian notion of justice are flawed. From this, a Dostoevskian system of universal justice emerges.
Table of Contents
- Mitya is impulsive - he is almost more 'epileptic' than Smerdyakov.
- Smerdyakov's condition is manageable and somewhat loopholeical.
- His disease of impulsivity is suspicious in the abruptness of its onset and the benefit that accompanies it.
