Was the Macmillan government’s decision to apply for membership of the European Communities the product of Britain’s declining global status?

Exposé Politique & international Sciences politiques

Date de publication :

02/04/2007

Langue :

Anglais

Format :

.doc

Nombre de pages :

6 pages

Niveau :

avancé

Consulté :

1 fois

Avis client :

non évalué

Validé par :

le comité Oboulo.com

5,95 € Ajouter au panier

Sommaire :

Sommaire

The application for membership and the decline of Britain's power
The Suez Crisis which: its crucial significance on the erosion of relations with the Commonwealth and the USA
Economical aspects
Success of the EEC compared to the European Free Trade Association (EFTA): consequences of decolonisation
Parties' strategies and the change in attitude towards sovereignty
The situation of post-war Britain and the Britain of the 1960s

Résumé :

The fear that britain would become, as Labour's post-war Foreign Secretary Ernest Bevin put it "just another european country" , was one of the main reasons to explain the British refusal to join a european supranational organisation. The Attlee government was indeed in favour of cooperation amongst Western european countries but did not want to be one of them . The view of the Foreign Office was that "Great britain must be viewed as a world power of the second rank and not merely as a unit as a federated Europe" . In fact, in 1945, britain was in a mood of triumph. It had won the war and was relatively intact. It was the only european country to have successfully defied Hitler for more than five years. It considered itself a great power, the centre of a Commonwealth and Empire covering one-fifth of the globe, and an equal of the Soviet Union and the United States of America. The British media even proudly referred to the United Kingdom as one of the Big Three and this was confirmed by Article 23 of the United Nations Charter which named britain as one of the five permanent members of the Security Council. This led to a kind of disdain for any special relations with other european countries. The foundation for what would become the european Union was then laid without the UK. However, just four years after its rejection of the 1957 Treaty of Rome, the macmillan government advanced its first application for membership to the european Economic Community (EEC). There were economic, political and security reasons for explaining this change in policy. The common denominator in these causes can be regarded as linked with a certain decline of britain's power in each of these spheres. But to what extent can we speak of britain's declining global status? What other reasons can be found?