What Would It Mean for an Event to Be a ‘Miracle’ in the Sense that Hume Describes It?
extension 5 word format
document in English
humanities/philosophy humanities/philosophy
 
school essay
published 04/01/2008
 
review : Completed
level : Advanced
requested 0 times
 
section Summary
 
 
In this essay, I hope to show that some of the criticisms levelled against Hume, especially those by Robert Hambourger (1980), are not effective in their attempts to erode Hume’s argument. These issues were discussed in an article by Dorothy Coleman (1988), which I will use to outline the problems with Hambourger’s arguments.
Firstly, I will give an interpretation of Hume’s definition of a miracle, as discussed in his Enquiries Concerning Human the Understanding (Selby-Bigge ed, 1975).
 
 

Table of Contents What Would It Mean for an Event to Be a ‘Miracle’ in the Sense that Hume Describes It? Table of Contents

 
  1. An interpretation of Hume's definition of a miracle.
  2. Idea - criticised by Robert Hambourger.
  3. applying considerations to miracles and their credibility.
  4. Hume's argument against the rationality of believing in miracles.
  5. A look at Coleman's (1988, pp9-10) lottery example.
  6. What Hambourger says could have occurred.
  7. Conclusion.
 
 
section Most downloaded documents over 30 days in humanities/philosophy
 
 
 
section Latest in the category humanities/philosophy
 
 
 
section From the same author